Return to home page
Searching: Otterbein library catalog
Some OPAL libraries remain closed or are operating at reduced service levels. Materials from those libraries may not be requestable; requested items may take longer to arrive. Note that pickup procedures may differ between libraries. Please contact your library for new procedures, specific requests, or other assistance.

LEADER 00000cam  2200781Ki 4500 
001    851639032 
003    OCoLC 
005    20200124042603.3 
006    m     o  d         
007    cr cn||||a|||| 
008    130704s2013    caua    obt   000 0 eng   
019    857923163|a1058377829 
020    9780833081940|q(electronic bk.) 
020    0833081942|q(electronic bk.) 
020    |z9780833077042 
020    |z083307704X 
035    (OCoLC)851639032|z(OCoLC)857923163|z(OCoLC)1058377829 
037    22573/ctt4bmqgq|bJSTOR 
040    DID|beng|erda|epn|cDID|dOCLCA|dCOO|dOCLCQ|dJSTOR|dUAT
       |dOCLCO|dYDXCP|dOCLCQ|dCUS|dOCLCF|dLND|dNJR|dVFL|dLOA|dICG
       |dOCLCA|dU3W|dAU@|dERL|dWYU|dICN|dNJT 
043    n-us--- 
049    MAIN 
050  4 UB243 
072  7 TEC025000|2bisacsh 
072  7 HIS027060|2bisacsh 
072  7 BUS041000|2bisacsh 
082 04 358.4/16850973|223 
088    RAND TR1291 
100 1  Camm, Frank A.,|d1949-|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n78044100 
245 10 Charting the course for a new Air Force inspection system 
       /|cFrank Camm, Laura Werber, Julie Kim, Elizabeth Wilke, 
       Rena Rudavsky. 
264  1 Santa Monica, CA :|bRAND,|c2013. 
300    1 online resource (xxiii, 149 pages) :|billustrations. 
336    text|btxt|2rdacontent 
337    computer|bc|2rdamedia 
338    online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 
340    |gpolychrome|2rdacc|0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/
       RDAColourContent/1003 
347    text file|2rdaft|0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/
       fileType/1002 
490 0  Technical report Charting the course for a new Air Force 
       inspection system 
504    Includes bibliographical references (pages 145-149). 
505 0  Introduction -- Choosing a better inspection interval -- 
       Reducing the inspection footprint -- Shift in relative 
       emphasis of external inspection and wing self-reporting --
       Introducing the New Unit Effectiveness Inspection (UEI) --
       Introducing the Management Internal Control Toolset (MICT)
       -- Implementation of significant change in the inspection 
       system -- Recommendations -- Appendix A: Analysis of 
       practices the air force inspection system might emulate --
       Appendix B: Analysis of the experiences of air force 
       personnel in the field -- Appendix C: Risk management in 
       the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Inspection 
       System -- Appendix D: Additional background on the air 
       force climate survey -- Appendix E: Additional background 
       on the Air Force Culture Assessment Safety Tool (AFCAST). 
520    The Air Force relies on inspections by the Inspector 
       General and assessments and evaluations by functional area
       managers to ensure that all wings comply with Air Force 
       standards and are ready to execute their contingency 
       missions. These oversight activities have grown 
       dramatically over time, and the Inspector General of the 
       Air Force (SAF/IG) is leading an Air Force-wide effort to 
       reduce this burden while also improving the quality of 
       oversight that the inspection system provides. In 2010, 
       SAF/IG asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to collect and assess 
       data on the inspection system and to identify effective 
       inspection and information collection practices that the 
       Air Force inspection system might emulate. Through a 
       review of such external inspection practices as the Air 
       Force Culture Assessment Tool program (AFCAST), the Air 
       Force Climate Survey, and the Federal Aviation Authority 
       (FAA) inspection system; an investigation of Air Force 
       personnel's experiences in the field; and a review of 
       literature on topics including leadership and 
       organizational change, RAND formulated recommendations 
       tailored to each of SAF/IG's five major inspection system 
       goals: (1) choosing a better inspection interval, (2) 
       reducing the inspection footprint, (3) increasing the 
       emphasis on self-inspections and self-reporting, (4) 
       introducing the new Unit Effectiveness Inspection (UEI), 
       and (5) introducing the Management Internal Control 
       Toolset (MICT). RAND's research and recommendations are 
       detailed in this report. 
536    The research described in this report was sponsored by the
       United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001. 
546    English. 
610 10 United States.|bAir Force|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n79126811|xInspection.|0http://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh00006257 
610 10 United States.|bDepartment of the Air Force.|bOffice of 
       the Inspector General.|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n81048562 
610 10 United States.|bAir Force|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n79126811|xSafety measures.|0http://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh00007912 
610 10 United States.|bAir Force|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n79126811|xReorganization.|0http://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh00007610 
650  0 Aeronautics, Military|zUnited States|0http://id.loc.gov/
       authorities/subjects/sh85001379|xSafety measures.|0http://
       id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00007912 
655  7 Technical reports.|2lcgft|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       genreForms/gf2015026093 
710 2  Project Air Force (U.S.)|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/
       names/n85368122 
710 2  Rand Corporation.|0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/
       n78083407 
776 1  |z9780833077042 
776 1  |z083307704X 
990    JSTOR|bBooks at JSTOR Open Access|c2019-10-22|yNew 
       collection jstor.oaebooks|5OH1 
LOCATION CALL # STATUS MESSAGE
 OHIOLINK BOOKS @ JSTOR    ONLINE  
View online

If you experience difficulty accessing or navigating this content, please contact the OPAL Support Team